Marlborough District Court - At trial, during a blistering cross examination, the arresting officer admitted "I wrote his name for him" on important papers concerning the rights of the accused. The independent investigation made the difference, proving this and other information used to combat every allegation made by the government. The prosecution case consisted of allegations that photos from a bad accident; admissions of guilt; bloodshot and watery eyes; a strong odor of alcohol; unsteadiness on feet; slurred speech; consuming 5 drinks, and more. After cross examination of the 2 ^nd police officer exposed several inconstancies, the closing argument to the jury finished off the relentless charge for not guilty. NOT GUILTY!